Integrative Health &
Applied Nutrition
magazine (IHCAN)
Integrative Health &
Applied Nutrition
magazine (IHCAN)
Great news!
We’re CPD accredited!
We know how important CPD is to our readers, that’s why we’re delighted that reading IHCAN counts towards your self-certified CPD with BANT, the NNA and the ANP.
There’s CPD and there’s IHCAN CPD. Feel the difference.
Editor’s note –
August 2025
Doctors: one hour’s nutrition training every four years “More than sufficient”
“Make America Healthy Again” is encouraging individual states to get nutrition education into schools, universities, medical schools – and into the brains of healthcare professionals.
Texas, the first to act , set up a Nutrition Advisory Committee to include one doctor certified in functional medicine and “at least one expert in metabolic health, culinary medicine, lifestyle medicine, or integrative medicine”. Great news! New food labelling laws will expose 44 additives legal in the US but banned in the UK and EU. School meals are getting cleaned up. We don’t know how much nutrition training Texas will require of doctors, but doubtless the medics will push back – as they have in Louisiana and New York.
Starting in 2026, physicians and physician assistants in Louisiana will really be challenged (sarcasm). They’ll need to complete a minimum of ONE HOUR of continuing education in nutrition and metabolic health every FOUR YEARS. In New York state it’s going to be THREE hours.
“Our physicians do believe that one hour every four years is more than sufficient”, says Jeff Williams, executive vice president and CEO of the Louisiana State Medical Society. “Physicians, particularly those who are younger, have been receiving nutrition in school and already discuss nutrition with their patients. For them, the challenge may be finding a course that qualifies and is new information”.
Oh dear. Doctors do “receive” nutrition in med school. They get about 3 hours a year for four years. In a 2023 survey, around 58% of MDs said they got NO formal nutrition education while in medical school. In a 2020 study for a BMJ journal, 70% of UK doctors reported receiving fewer than two hours of nutrition while at medical school.
And yet…everyone agrees with some variation of “Diet-related diseases are the No. 1 cause of death” (University of North Dakota College of Nursing), although one of the UK’s most nutrition-friendly medical schools, the University of Dundee, waters this down to “Nutrition plays a key role in the prevention and management of disease”. Dundee has spent the last 15 years working nutrition into its medical degree and now has its hours up to “a minimum of 30 hours of nutrition focused core teaching”. So… roughly 7 hours a year.
It’s pathetic. Doctors: you’re never going to be experts in nutrition, so why don’t you just leave it to us?
Now all this would be, well, “academic” if the UK population was not suffering because of this deliberate ignorance and misdirection. Hello? We’re in the middle of epidemics of obesity and diabetes. Cancer and heart disease are increasing.
People go to their doctors for help and, to twist the phrase, they don’t know that they (GPs and specialists) don’t know (about nutrition). They don’t know how genuinely useless this makes much of what passes for primary “care” in this country. And in the media they see doctors setting really poor examples. Two this month:
First one, a British doctor on social media promoting the glories of bread. Gluten? Well, who knows, really? You should focus on the “right” sort of wheat, and sourdough is probably the answer. I couldn’t focus on much beyond the fact that she was clearly BMI-challenged….and yet the plaudits rained in from people “freed” to eat more bread.
Second one, TV doctor Hilary Jones: “Why I travelled 180 miles to have my hip operation” all over the media. Dr Jones is 72 and this was his SECOND hip operation. Why does he need two new hips? Osteoarthritis. He’s never had a clue about how to prevent or treat it, he’s just let it go on and then got new ones – while on tv giving health advice. Even worse, he actually believes he’s worn out his joints with too much exercise!…
...Read more...
What’s included with your subscription…
Buy a subscription and we plant a tree
We care deeply about the planet and creating a business that gives back to nature.
That’s why we’ve partnered with One Tree Planted to plant a tree on your behalf, as a thank you for subscribing.
Trees clean our air and water, create habitats for biodiversity, contribute to our health and wellbeing, and create jobs for social impact.
Buy a subscription and we plant a tree
We care deeply about the planet and creating a business that gives back to nature.
That’s why we’ve partnered with One Tree Planted to plant a tree on your behalf, as a thank you for subscribing.
Trees clean our air and water, create habitats for biodiversity, contribute to our health and wellbeing, and create jobs for social impact.

“I consider IHCAN magazine to be a good reference source because the authors
are reputable, sound-thinking experienced clinicians. I read it to keep
up-to-date with current trends. Keep up the good work!”
Susan Farrer
We’re always fully referenced
We don’t put a big emphasis on being “evidence based” in the conventional sense, mainly because the bulk of the evidence used in meta analyses and systematic reviews and to produce “guidelines” is not to be trusted. As Prof Richard David Feinman puts it, the meta-analysis is the “most dangerous” activity plaguing modern medical literature. And RCTs are of no use in assessing complex conditions that we address with multiple interventions – such as Dr Dale Bredesen’s Alzheimer’s protocol. Likewise, we highly value the hard-won clinical experience of multiple practitioners accumulated over the years and handed down over generations of evolving natural medicine practice. That said, we do put a lot of effort into referencing our features. References are online to save space, available within our members area.

We’re always fully referenced
We don’t put a big emphasis on being “evidence based” in the conventional sense, mainly because the bulk of the evidence used in meta analyses and systematic reviews and to produce “guidelines” is not to be trusted. As Prof Richard David Feinman puts it, the meta-analysis is the “most dangerous” activity plaguing modern medical literature. And RCTs are of no use in assessing complex conditions that we address with multiple interventions – such as Dr Dale Bredesen’s Alzheimer’s protocol. Likewise, we highly value the hard-won clinical experience of multiple practitioners accumulated over the years and handed down over generations of evolving natural medicine practice. That said, we do put a lot of effort into referencing our features. References are online to save space, available within our members area.

START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TODAY
Whether you prefer print or digital subscriptions, we’ve got you covered. And remember, ALL subscriptions include access to all the references,
an archive of searchable back issues stretching back to 2014 and lots of free webinars.




Contact us
Target Publishing Ltd
The Old Dairy Hudsons Farm Fieldgate Lane
Ugley Green
CM22 6HJ
UK
Tel. 01279 810080
Email. info@targetpublishing.com
WhatsApp. 07457 405049
Quick Links
Subscribe
Advertise with us
Log In
IHCAN Conferences (online education)
IHCAN Summit (live in-person events)
References
Contact us